Went back to the neuro for a headache follow-up. Regarding my anxiety over the possibility that a no-contrast MRI could have missed a brain tumor, he very bluntly said, "You don't need contrast" (for my situation). It was my definite impression that had he ordered the MRI (my GP actually did it), he wouldn't have ordered contrast. So, I think I'm over that.But as my reward, I get to spend some more quality time in that magnetic-machine-on-steroids for a cervical-spine MRI. (If I say "c-spine," do I get to sit at the cool kids' lunch table?) Basically, after discussing what's transpired headache-wise over the past four weeks, he just wants to see if there's anything going on in my neck to account for the headaches, like disc problems. He doesn't think he'll find any. I'm also going to try a muscle relaxer instead of a migraine med because some more recent symptoms point toward muscle issues. The more familiar I get with headaches and their diagnoses, the more I realize how inexact the process can be. Symptoms of certain headaches mimic other headaches, the symptoms don't always fall neatly into a diagnosis, and there isn't even universal agreement on symptoms. Patients respond to stimuli and treatments differently. Plus, there are back, neck, jaw, muscle, and nerve issues (among other things) that can cause headaches, and finding the true culprit can take some time and experimentation. And apart from only a few causes, like a tumor, aneurysm, herniated disc, etc., you can't really see what's causing a headache. It seems as though you exclude causes until you think you have the answer.Anywho, while I'm lying in the "open" MRI machine--homey don't play no closed MRI--I'll distract myself by thinking "baseball, baseball." That comes in handy for all sorts of activities.