Ok, so it's six months and two weeks since I started twitching and I thought I'd come to terms with it, so why am I still freaking? Well I'm not freaking 24/7, but the anxiety is enough to put a damper on most things and I realise that it has to stop somewhere. For the past month I've been away from my normal routine and, believe it or not, perception of twitching has been at an all time low. But now that I'm back home and have time to think, my anxiety has ramped up again tenfold. I think most of it is down to something my EMG guy said, regarding a six month timeframe. He said, "If anything nasty is going to happen after you start twitching, it usually happens in the first six months OR SO". (Initials are mine). It's the 'OR SO' which is doing my head in. I'm now at six months and two weeks since I first noticed twitches and, however mad it may sound, am currently expecting that something nasty to start happening. And since I've been back home - which is all of two days - I've been twitching more than ever before. Mostly - as usual - in calves and feet arches, but with random hitters elsewhere. Plus I perceive weakness, although I'm able to do all of the strength tests at which I've become such an expert in the past six months.So is this six months business an arbitrary thing? If nothing nasty happens now, should I wait until seven months, then eight, then nine? Why not ten, eleven or twelve? You can see where this is going. I don't want another EMG and my neuro has told me not to bother him any more, and that I should get psychological support rather than neurological reassurance.But how are psychologists going to help when they have no idea of the frustration that one feels from a condition which is described as benign, but which at the same time has all the hallmark signs of something really nasty?Anyway, sorry for venting. Someone the other day remarked on how cool I was over this whole thing, and that I'd finally beaten my anxiety. How wrong they were...