Exactly a year ago today I noticed a vibrating sensation in my right thigh, as though my mobile phone was going off. No mobile phone there, though, and when I got home, and Googled, a whole drama was unleashed that continues to this day. Within twenty four hours I was twitching in both calves, and they've been twitching more or less constantly ever since.Of course, the twitching didn't stop there. Within a few weeks it had also spread to my arches, and while calves and arches are my dominant twitchspots, I get random 'hitters' almost everywhere.I have no idea what caused my twitching, although I did undergo a rather traumatic withdrawal from benzodiazepines just a couple of months before the twitching started, and it's well known that withdrawal can cause fasciculations. For two months before I started twitching I had intense burning sensations in my left arm and both legs - the places, strangely enough, where I twitch most now. I saw a neurologist on account of the burning and came away with a 'clean bill of health'. I saw a different neurologist a few days after I started twitching, and again he deemed me free of any neurological condition apart from twitching.Two weeks after I began to twitch, I had an EMG, which was also 'clean'. The neuro-muscular consultant who did the EMG said that what I had was 'consistent with benign fasciculation syndrome' and sent me on my way.I have had a further two neuro clinicals since then - one in May, another in November. Both times I was 'cleared'.So how are things now, a year down the line? Well, I was hoping that the anxiety would have disappeared by now, but unfortunately that's not the case. While I have no discernible weakness, I do have muscle and joint pain, and this gives me cause for concern. My main issue is the mixed messages that I get about twitching in general.The twitching in my arches, for example, comes and goes. This surely must be a good sign? Yes, say some; not necessarily, say others. My twitching is largely confined to my calves. This surely must be a good sign? Yes, say some; not necessarily, say others. Some of my twitches are so severe, they actually lift my trousers. This surely must be a good sign? Yes, say some; not necessarily, say others. Then there are the reports - scarce though they may be - of people who twitch for a very long time before developing weakness. The question I always ask is, "If it can happen to them, how can I be sure it won't happen to me?" The guy who did my EMG, two weeks into twitching, said that if I wanted to have a second EMG, I should come back in six months, because - and I quote - "if anything was going to happen, it would happen within six months or thereabouts."This wasn't particularly helpful, and for the next few months I was ticking off calendar days until I reached the six month 'cut-off'. But then there was "thereabouts". What exactly did this mean? Six months and a few days? Six months and a few weeks? Seven months, eight? When the six months had passed, I thought I'd have some kind of mental closure on all of this, but it wasn't to be. And now, a year down the line, I find myself almost as anxious as I was in the run up to the six month mark.Of course, logical me says that there is a general pattern to the 'nasty disease', and that most people who are unfortunate to contract it will develop weakness long before they start twitching. And even those who do twitch first will usually become weak quite soon afterwards: the Mayo clinic mentions a three-month period; Forbes mentions six, and so on.Unfortunately, it is the non-logical me that often wins out, as it is winning out today, on this, my first 'twitchiversary'. It should be some kind of comforting milestone, but I have to admit that in reality, like all birthdays, it's just another day.