I just want people who read this quote; "My neuro dismissed twitching as a presentation of ALS saying it does happen but its unusual." to understand that just because a VERY few cases of ALS patients do get classified as having twitches as a first presentation, that this does NOT mean they had a clean EMG, or that the twitches CAUSED the ALS.
It is clear and precise to say that in ALL cases of ALS, fasciculations are caused by dying and disconnection muscles and nerve endings, and the twitches are a SECONDARY reaction, not a primary action causing the ALS. It IS possibe for some people who actually do have ALS to first NOTICE twitches before weakness IF it was in a larger muscle group, which could take longer to notice any true, "clinical" weakness at early onset, but after months of twitching with no weakness, it is pretty evident that ALS is not probable.
Again, once ALL of the so called "twitches presenting first" ALS patients (which was only a couple) had EMG's, they ALL showd abnormal results.
It's kind of like seeing a lump on the side of your neck and finding out it was cancer. The lump didn't CAUSE the cancer, because the lump IS the cancer. If a biopsy was taken, it would clearly show and confirm that it was indeed cancer. ALS twitches happen for an entirely different reason than BFS twitches, and in fact, they are quite different, both visually and clinically than an ALS twitch, being that ALS twitches are true fasciculations, when most BFS twitches are not actual fasciculations at all, hence why some people twitch WHILE getting their EMG's done, yet the twitch never showed-up on the EMG.
So, What Rich and his neuso said is completely true, I just want it to be clear so no one freaks out about what his neuso said. You have to take things at face value and take into consideration ALL aspects of what is being said to understand what is going-on. In NO way does ALS present with twitches alone and NOT show it on the EMG.
A person may "notice" the twitches first, but that certainly doesn't mean ALS wasn't already clinically there, or wasn't detected on an EMG first. This is exactly the same thing the Mayo Study neglected to say when they stated that a couple of patients presented with twitches first. You think? People don't have EMG's in their houses, so it is quite possible that someone might happen to notice a small area of twitching BEFORE they npticed any weakness or got confirmed with an abnormal EMG.
If you had a clean EMG, you are about as clear as possible that you do NOT have ALS. If you have been twitching for quite some time, all over, yet you haven;t had an EMG yet, and you have no apparent weakness, you are HIGHLY unlikely to have ALS. I mean really, have any of you seen ANY one on here actually have ALS? No. Doesn't that speak for itself?