As several of you may know, I am a mathematician by training and you may be wondering wtf does this have to do with BFS? Well, I was very intrigued by TwitchBFS's post about HPA axis dysfunction and after thinking some more about how "suddenly" severe twitching comes on and often persists unmitigated for years and years, even for life, I think I can at the very least offer up a simple mathematical theory that at the very least may explain what's going on neuronally and why the term "neuronal hyperexcitability" (I think a term Matt's neurologist coined) may be the most appropriate name for what's going on.It is a medically proven fact that it is physiologically more difficult for muscles to relax than to contract. It actually takes MORE energy and spinal coordination for muscles to stay in a relaxed state than it does for them to be in movement or in contraction. As counterintuitive as this may seem, it is true for all vertebrate animals and part of the great mystery of the spinal cord and its related functions. If you don't believe me, look it up. So what does math have to do with it? There is a branch of mathematics that deals with real-life situations such as disease outbreak, population growth & decay, and mechanics called "nonlinear dynamics" or "dynamical systems." If you have an engineering background (which oddly enough seems to run in the BFS family), you may be familiar with this field of math. If not and you hate math, don't stop reading yet...this is going to be very non-technical. So what is a catastrophe mathematically speaking?Well in math, we say that a dynamical system can be in one of three states: stable, semi-stable, and unstable. As to which state a system is in, it really depends on a number of factors, including initial conditions, perturbating factors, etc etc.The bottom line is this: all dynamical systems, including the human body, are in a constant state of entropy, meaning that they naturally tend toward chaos or instability. However, our body is designed via evolution to try to maintain a state of homeostasis, or stability, if you like.To use a fun analogy, think of two different bridges that were designed in two different ways, one with more mechanical flaws than the other. Now pretend this bridge is your neuromuscular system. Intuitively, the bridge built with the greatest structural integrity will have the best chance of surviving disaster and the one with less structural integrity is most likely to collapse. So the analogy would go that a person with a very strong neuromuscular system would have a better chance of not developing BFS than someone whose neuromuscular system is anatomically different (i.e. the T-channels in the muscle are structurally different...this is what one neurologist who specializes in neuronal imagining thinks and there is some evidence to support this theory...but even if you don't agree with it, let's just roll with the fact that *something* is different anatomically in people who develop BFS). Now both bridges can carry cars across them just fine when in operation, but over time stressors and other factors (wind shear, rust, age, load) will cause one bridge to become weaker than the other. Both bridges are considered to be "stable" while still in operation and can carry cars across them just fine.Again, the analogy would go that a person with a normally structured neuromuscular system would be able to handle the stressors of life (anxiety, unhealthy food, f*cked up sleep patterns, stress, etc.) much better than the person with altered T-channels. But, while both neuromuscular systems are in a "stable" state, you wouldn't notice any difference in muscle function between the two people. Neither has BFS. In mathematics, there is usually a value that determines when a system that is stable will cross the line into instability. The general rule of thumb is while stable or near stability, your system will tend to stay there in a stable state, but more you perturb away from that state, the more you risk crossing what is known as a "catastrophe point" at which the system enters into a state of sudden and very abrupt instability that is very often intractable.With the less stable bridge, all those years of wear and tear and its fundamentally flawed design bring it closer and closer to that catastrophe point as the days pass. Then all it takes is one triggering event - it could be an earthquake, heavy winds, a column that fails under load, or anything really...the bridge reaches its "catastrophe point" and enters into collapse mode. Now the bridge may not fully collapse at this point, but that's where it is ultimately headed. Think of "Galloping Gertie." For awhile, the swaying bridge was still servicable, but by today's structual engineering standards...um no. A bridge that fails will do so remarkably quickly...it's awe inspiring how fast a bridge can collapse.Now neuromuscularly speaking, there also would appear to come a point at which a "triggering event" such as too much stress, a vaccination, illness, drug, or whatever, causes the delicate cerebral-spinal-muscular balance required for optimal muscle relaxation to break down and break down rapidly. This triggering event would bring about the catastrophe causing muscle relaxation stability to enter into a sudden and in some cases rapidly progressing state of instability...the bridge has collapsed. The whole system enters into a state of instability and complete chaos takes over (hence rapid, widespread fasciculations)...everything is all garbled up and chaotic. In a mathematical system, instability feeds off of itself and just gets worse and worse...think of an earthquake where megatons of pressure on the earths crust are released all at once. There are going to be little aftershocks all over for decades to come. BFS is like an earthquake...you get nasty ass twitching in your calves and feet to start maybe, and then aftershock effects all over the f*cking place...and then another big earthquake (flare-up) and so on, for the rest of your life, although things do seem to calm down for most people...and why?Well, even chaotic systems can approach a state of stability over time and appear to settle down, but it's still chaotic! And in some rare cases, they can return to a state of near stability.So blame BFS on your genetics maybe...altered T-channels in the muscle fibers...and just way too much stress on an already delicate system. BFS begins when the neuromuscular system passes its catastrophe point, which is easier to do in people who suffer from generalized anxiety because there is probably something already there (either environmental, genetic, or a combination of both) that keeps driving their nervous system into a state of more and more disorder, making that ever-so-delicate balance of muscle relaxation harder and harder to maintain. When a bridge collapses, engineers will just build a new one in its place. In our case, we cannot build a new neuromuscular system (not yet, anyway), but we can respect the disorder that years of panic, stress, anxiety, and self-abuse brought and change our lifestyles so that we can approach as much stability as possible in an intractably chaotic system...perhaps enough stability to not even notice the twitching anymore.