Hello,When it comes to MND/ALS I am a bad researcher, I cherry pick the medical literature to feed my fears and often ignore those articles (and neurologists), which could offer huge reassurance. i.e. I polarise my evidence to fit my symptom profile, to convince myself that my fears are founded and that I am going to indeed be the next diagnosed ALS patient. The other avenue is to admit I have health anxiety (but this is new to me as I have only ever had it about this disease), also secretly I feel this admission may jinx the whole thing and I will in fact actually have the disease after all. So I sit on this jaggy uncomfortable fence and not commit to jumping down on any side.Thought I would change tact and write about a good ALS article. I apologise if it has been mentioned before, but here goes. Hope it sooths some hyper excited nerves out there.It is an article which took a look at the incidence of ALS in Europe per age group and region. It chose 6 large databases and combined the stats from a 2 year period, so to have a bigger patient sample number and hence a more accurate result. Without going into the ins and outs of the paper (I will enclose the links at the end so you can do this yourself). One of the tables is of great interest to me as it gives age and gender-specific incidence of ALS per 100,000 person-years among those 18 years and over based on combined data from these six European ALS Registers for the two year period. Incident rates are all very well but let’s have the actual case numbers. Take the age group 30 -34 which seems to be a lot of people on here. Well out of 1,856,393 men in this group only 5 were diagnosed over a 2 year period, and only 2 woman out of over 1.8 million counterparts. That is a total of 7 cases out of over 3.7 million people aged between 30-34 (Incidence of 0.2/100,000) We know risk increases with age so let’s try the 45-49 age bracket. Here we again see how rare ALS actually is. Over a 2 year period out of a sample group of 1,565,000 age matched men only 35 were registered as having ALS, and similarly only 23 woman out of over 1.5 million. Total 58 cases out of just over 3.1 million people (incidence rate of 1.8/100,000Even if we look at the age band with the highest incidence which in this study was the 70 – 74 year olds, with an incidence of 8.3/100,000. Again this equates to just 172 cases out of over 2 million70-74 year olds.Of interest is the total for all age groups. The study looked at a population of over 38 million people and out of this there were a total of just 1028 ALS cases registered over the 2 year period So to recap the total over the 2 years from these 6 databases combined, Age 30-34 7 cases out of 3.7 million people. Age group 45-49 only 58 cases out of 3.1 million population size, and ages 70-74 172 cases from 2 million age matched counterparts.All the age groups are in the table, so you can check out your own.If in theory 6.7 % of all ALS cases in this study present with twitching as the initial symptom that is only about 70 of the registered patients (1028) out of a population of 31 million. 70 out of 38 million people will develop twitches that will turn out that turn out to be ALS. I understand this last statement is justa theory and not actual data. I understand there are limitations. The study does not include or distinguish inherited forms (mutations in neuroprotective genes that are passed through families) inherited), they class the above as spontaneous cases. The study was done a few years back but I am informed that the incident rate has pretty much stayed stable. Although there is better equipment and knowledge that may identify more cases, they also discount much diagnosis.Anyway links below.I know we will all still worry as I said in a previous post “Fools rush in where fools have rushed before” ….. and I am a bigger fool than most of you.Take care Love Helen xxx