ho.katiemccann
New member
As some of you know I have had 2 EMGs. One done by a physiatrist and one by a neuro.
The first one was 'abnormal' , the second one normal.
The neuro wasnt concerned by the first study and said that EMG's should be left to the experts.
The discrepancy worries me a lot.
The first report noted "denervation potentials in left deltoid and paraspinal at c5/c6". It also had a note of 1+ and 2+ against the column marked "FIBS" for those muscle groups. I guesss FIBS means fibrillations. There is no column for Fasics. Do they lump them together ever?
Anyway, like an idiot, while worrying about it this morning, I looked up fibrillations and found this "as a general rule, fibrillations never occur in normal individuals. They are symptomatic of neurogenic disease." Fasiculations can be benign as you all know.
So if the first guy thought he saw some major problem in my EMG which he concluded was a radiculopathy, why on earth do you think the neuro would disregard it in favor of the study done at his hospital which was normal.
Have any of you ever had anything abnormal turn up on an EMG that has subsequently turned out to be ok and not the dreaded ALS?
My husband says we should go with the word of the neuro who is an ALS specialist at a top NYC hospital rather than the physiatrist.
But surely computers dont lie - I mean how can one EMG be abnormal and another normal?
Doesnt make sense to me yet no-one else seems concerned.
Anyone got any info on this stuff?
Kate
The first one was 'abnormal' , the second one normal.
The neuro wasnt concerned by the first study and said that EMG's should be left to the experts.
The discrepancy worries me a lot.
The first report noted "denervation potentials in left deltoid and paraspinal at c5/c6". It also had a note of 1+ and 2+ against the column marked "FIBS" for those muscle groups. I guesss FIBS means fibrillations. There is no column for Fasics. Do they lump them together ever?
Anyway, like an idiot, while worrying about it this morning, I looked up fibrillations and found this "as a general rule, fibrillations never occur in normal individuals. They are symptomatic of neurogenic disease." Fasiculations can be benign as you all know.
So if the first guy thought he saw some major problem in my EMG which he concluded was a radiculopathy, why on earth do you think the neuro would disregard it in favor of the study done at his hospital which was normal.
Have any of you ever had anything abnormal turn up on an EMG that has subsequently turned out to be ok and not the dreaded ALS?
My husband says we should go with the word of the neuro who is an ALS specialist at a top NYC hospital rather than the physiatrist.
But surely computers dont lie - I mean how can one EMG be abnormal and another normal?
Doesnt make sense to me yet no-one else seems concerned.
Anyone got any info on this stuff?
Kate