Hi Kate,
How odd that a physiatrist thought he saw atrophy. Has anyone concurred with his assessment, or was it just a fluke?
Otherwise, you certainly could be one of us. It is hard for us to say, but sensory symptoms, twitching, tremors, and perceived weakness are all commonly reported amongst those of us with bfs.
You can always read horror stories on other boards, and, since I haven't read them myself, I can't comment on them, but we pretty much make it a rule to stay off of those things here. I'm doubtful that much of the stuff you read there is even true, or at best, it is gross exaggeration by people who are understandably overwrought.
I do know that we've had plenty of neuros tell us, (speaking as the collective, 'we' here,) that they have NEVER diagnosed a case of **S in which there was measurable clinical weakness and a negative emg. We've been assured, time and time again that the emg would always show something.
There is, of course, some room for error in interpretation, but considering how progressive **S generally is, it would be extremely rare for the emg findings to be negative for long.
It surprises me that a specialist in Manhattan wouldn't have suggested bfs as a possibility? Where did you go?
I'm not sure if this helps you or not. I wanted to answer you as best as I could.
Blessings,
Sue
How odd that a physiatrist thought he saw atrophy. Has anyone concurred with his assessment, or was it just a fluke?
Otherwise, you certainly could be one of us. It is hard for us to say, but sensory symptoms, twitching, tremors, and perceived weakness are all commonly reported amongst those of us with bfs.
You can always read horror stories on other boards, and, since I haven't read them myself, I can't comment on them, but we pretty much make it a rule to stay off of those things here. I'm doubtful that much of the stuff you read there is even true, or at best, it is gross exaggeration by people who are understandably overwrought.
I do know that we've had plenty of neuros tell us, (speaking as the collective, 'we' here,) that they have NEVER diagnosed a case of **S in which there was measurable clinical weakness and a negative emg. We've been assured, time and time again that the emg would always show something.
There is, of course, some room for error in interpretation, but considering how progressive **S generally is, it would be extremely rare for the emg findings to be negative for long.
It surprises me that a specialist in Manhattan wouldn't have suggested bfs as a possibility? Where did you go?
I'm not sure if this helps you or not. I wanted to answer you as best as I could.
Blessings,
Sue